|
Lin,
Po-Hsien : Theorizing Your Room
Add
a link that conceptualizes your room, perhaps to follow "my concept
of home" add another link: "my room concept." Present
why you selected games, shopping, and Memphis style "fun"
furniture to fill a room or connect to the room. How does this house
space convey the meaning of life, the purpose of life, or your inscribed
or embodied experiences of life? Is it about desire? Is it about fulfilling
needs beyond the basics of shelter? Are your needs met with games, shopping,
and light-hearted playfulness? Convey in this presentation who the room
is for. And, describe if you welcome changes or additions to your room
or wish it to remain as you designed it. Perhaps discuss the relationship
of play to art if that is a major focus for the room (see Ellen Dissanayaki--What
is Art For? in which she sees a relation between the human behavior
of play, ritual, and the natural need to create art.).
|
Lin,
Po-Hsien::
Your Process Site
Something for fun-1: You might analyze yourself in terms of what you define
as fun and who would feel included in this concept of fun. Relabel to
be more descriptive.
To
know more about me section is your self-sculpture and shows multiple facets
of who you are. Very well presented in the complexity of how you see yourself.
In
your conclusion you state: "a safe home base for women to pursue
a career"
What
is a safe home base for women to pursue a career or for men today without
women in housewife or childcare roles?
What
supports are needed to make it work for women and men. Do both need a
wife? Or are there alternatives? What alternatives or ways do you image
a safe home base for women to pursue careers?
|
|
Lin,
Po-Hsien : Your Video
-
Good
solution (and camera composition) to the parallel track idea with
the sidewalk instead of the railroad. The library scene was fascinating
and conveyed to me a similar metaphor of never meeting like the parallel
tracks concept, only they become each other. Glad you were able to
bring the video down to 7MB and revised it following suggestions from
the email I sent on 11/8/01.
-
Production
Statement revision suggestion: This three-minute video is of two Asian
women in their early twenties who pursue emancipation to love each
other in the USA, outside the constraints of their homeland. Using
a visual metaphor of how parallel lines that in reality never meet,
do meet in the two-dimensional conventions of linear perspective,
the video concludes with the reality that their new found joyous Lesbian
identity may be an illusion in their memories when in their homeland.
-
It
seems that with the last line in the production statement that the
walking away could dissolve into 2 or 3 stills (perhaps filtered with
transparencies or something that seams dreamlike or unreal) with PhotoShop
collages of Taiwan indicating memories of homeland, perhaps with a
close-up shot of the two women looking close with faces almost touching
to turning away and leaving the camera frame, one from right and the
other from the left. It depends how important this conflict is to
the purpose of the video. It comes across well that the 2 women become
friends and begin to share a lot of fun times together with some clues
to intimacy developing. I am not sure if the parallel lines in relation
to their Taiwan culture comes across as an obstacle to their new found
sexual identity.
-
I think it would enhance to add a production statement under the video
in your process site.
-
I
think there will be various interpretations of your video that may
differ somewhat from your goal statement. The question, "what
are you chasing for?" is intriguing in the use of the word "chasing."
Chase makes me think of a game, like tag, "you are are it"
and chase others. It is what many experienced on the playground when
boys would chase girls and girls chased boys and girls chased girls.
I am not sure if boys chased boys.
-
Technically,
I would cut from the hug to the flag above to pan out and cut to dissolve
of car leaving. This would streamline the video (reducing its memory
load) and take out the jerky camera movement and jerky upward pan
to flag. Since this camera jerky movements start the video it distracts
and can be reduced and give the same impact. The helping with the
suitcase and moving in together is good camera work and the image
telling of their relationship in which their bodies overlap, then
split and hands/bodies do not quite touch but intimacy is suggested.
-
The
scene on the steps and in the park sharing a drink suggests intimacy.
Walking with arm around shows that a relationship has developed further
since the earlier scene of carrying the suitcase.
-
The
page turning effect to begin the library scene is a good choice. The
2 women never meeting and then becoming each other coming toward the
viewer conveys to me their identity found in each other--using the
analogy of finding knowledge in the library. This is to me the most
ingenious scene!
-
Silence
and then the music starts again with "Hi Girls! Are you pursuing
for--that vanishing point--in front of you" changes the meaning
from where I thought it was going.
-
Grammatically,
the word "for" is not needed.
-
There
is so much written and discussed about women's erasure and invisibility--each
means different things--the ending references these struggles for
women. The one woman looks back, 2 times, and then stares back (at
past, at obstacles?)
-
Why
do you call the women, girls? Bad Girls, Good Girls, Grrrl, Girlie
magazines--what connotation do you bring to the use of the term "girl"
instead of "woman?"
|